FIRAC Method
Facts: The US Attorney General brought charges against Hazelwood School District citing that the school had a habit of discriminating against African-Americans when hiring teachers. According to him, this breached Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The government presented statistical evidence that indicated the number of African Americans employed. The district court ruled in favor of Hazelwood , affirming that the evidence provided did not show a practice of prejudice. The US court of Appeals reversed this judgment.
Issue: did the lower court act in error when it decided to rule in favor of Hazelwood?
Rule: Statistics can be a vital source of proof especially in cases that pertain to employment discrimination. Where gross statistical differences can be demonstrated, they solely may in a proper case amount to prima facie proof of a practice or pattern of discrimination. It is normally to be anticipated that non-bias hiring practices will in time lead to a labor force more or less representative of the ethnic and racial composition of the population, although Title VII compels no requirement that a labor force reflects the general population.
Analysis: Yes. The lower court erred when it ruled in favor of Hazelwood. This is because it erred in establishing the pertinent labor market. This court also failed to put into consideration that Hazelwood may have been able to disprove some of the statistics with evidence of its practices of hiring post Title VII.
Conclusion: The finding of the court was mainly founded on statistical evidence that the government introduced demonstrating a comparison of the proportion of black Americans on Hazelwood’s teaching personnel with the proportion of teachers in the region who were African Americans instead of the percentage of black American pupils in Hazelwood District. The fairly small proportion of back American teachers that Hazelwood had employed when coupled with the proof presented by the government prompted the court of appeals to rule against Hazelwood.
Study Notes:
The case of Hazelwood School District v. United States (1983) dealt with the issue of censorship in

The case of Hazelwood School District v. United States (1983) dealt with the issue of censorship in public schools. The Supreme Court of the United States applied the FIRAC (Facts, Issues, Rules, Application, Conclusion) method in making its decision.

  1. Facts: The case involved a school newspaper in the Hazelwood School District in which articles on divorce, pregnancy, and contraception were censored by the school principal.
  2. Issues: The main issue was whether the censorship violated the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech.
  3. Rules: The Supreme Court applied the principle that public schools have the authority to regulate speech that is inconsistent with their educational mission.
  4. Application: The Court held that the censorship of the articles in the school newspaper was reasonable and did not violate the First Amendment, as the articles were deemed to be inappropriate for the school environment.
  5. Conclusion: The Supreme Court concluded that the Hazelwood School District’s censorship of the school newspaper articles was constitutional and did not violate the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech.

The FIRAC method was used to analyze the facts and legal issues in the Hazelwood School District v. United States case and to make a decision regarding the constitutionality of the censorship of the school newspaper articles.